18 - 19 FEBRUARY 1996 - WARM FRONT

by ZAMG


18 February 1996/06.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image; SatRep overlay: names of conceptual models; SatRep menu: key parameters for Warm Front
For the diagnosis of the physical state of the Warm Front, a couple of key parameters and useful key parameter combinations are available which were chosen with respect to the conceptual model (for more information compare manual, Conceptual Models: Warm Front Band - Meteorological physical background or Conceptual Models: Warm Front Shield - Meteorological physical background ).

Front Indicator This is a line indicating the maximum of the thermal front parameter (TFP) 500/850 hPa (*10-1Km-1).
TFP + WLA This is a combination of the thermal front parameter (TFP) 500/850 hPa greater than 3 units and warm advection (WA) 500/1000 hPa (K 12h-1); this combination of key parameters is especially indicative of the thermal characteristics of a Warm Front.
TA>=0 This parameter shows maxima of warm advection; although already contained in TFP + WA, sometimes the necessity arises to look at this field separately.
Relative Stroeme This parameter shows relative streams on isentropic surfaces; relative streams are indicative of the different air masses involved in the process and of areas of sinking or rising motion; they can be used to explain cloud configurations not normally encountered.
VQS Gives the location of available vertical cross sections (VQS)

The IR satellite image shows a cloud shield over the Netherlands and western Germany without any significant structure; the WV image contains a notable Dark Stripe at the leading eastern cloud edge. This dry air appears typically at that position and marks the cyclonic side of the jet axis accompanying the Warm Front cloud edge (compare Cloud fibre at jet axis ).

18 February 1996/06.00 UTC - Meteosat WV image; SatRep overlay: names of conceptual models
18 February 1996/06.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image; blue: thermal front parameter (TFP) 500/850 hPa, red thick: front indicator, red: temperature advection - WA 1000 hPa;
The key parameter combination of TFP (blue) and WA (red) is typical for a Warm Front accompanied by a cloud shield. As is very often the case with Warm Fronts, the maximum of the TFP which identifies the frontal line cannot be identified by closed isolines but only by a trough-like feature. A warm advection maximum is in front of the TFP and the front indicator (thick red line), being the main reason for the development of the Warm Front cloudiness. In this case WA extends across the frontal line into the area of the warm sector. This is typical for a Warm Front accompanied by a cloud shield, in contrast to a Warm Front accompanied by a cloud band (compare Conceptual Models: Warm Front Band or Conceptual Models: Warm Front Shield ).

Explanations for these typical structures can be found by looking at vertical cross sections and relative streams, especially the "Warm Conveyor Belt".

18 February 1996/06.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image; ECMWF grid superimposed, position of vertical cross section indicated
The vertical cross section relevant for the warm front extends from France (approximately 48N/01E) across Belgium and Germany to the coastline of Poland (approximately 54N/18E).
18 February 1996/06.00 UTC - Vertical cross section; black: isentropes (ThetaE), blue: relative humidity, orange thin: IR pixel values, orange thick: WV pixel values
18 February 1996/06.00 UTC - Vertical cross section; black: isentropes (ThetaE), red thick: temperature advection - WA, red thin: temperature advection - CA, orange thin: IR pixel values, orange thick: WV pixel values
The black lines in the two cross sections represent equivalent potential temperatures and show a broad crowding zone and a zone of high gradients of isentropes. Such a zone indicates a frontal surface in showing the quick change of temperature (the temperature discontinuity) taking place at fronts. In this case the zone of highest gradients rises from the surface at about 50N/08E up to a layer of 500 - 400 hPa at approximately 54N/18E.

The relative humidity shows high values of 90% (up to about 700 hPa) and 70% (up to about 450 hPa) on top of this frontal surface. This characterizes the humid air gliding upwards while dry air is sinking below the frontal surface from heights around 400 hPa, where it is only 10% down to about 700 hPa where it is about 50%. Temperature advection consists of a broad zone of pronounced WA with maximal values within the frontal zone.

Both parameter fields show a transition zone between 600 and 400 hPa close to the southern end of the vertical cross section (48N/01E) where humidity decreases to 30% and WA to 0. Above this layer, between 400 and 300 hPa, a second area of WA with very humid air involved is indicated. This is an upper level Warm Front zone separated from the main warm front. Comparing with the satellite image, the accompanying cloudiness can be found within the warm sector where a second WA maximum has already been discussed. Satellite signals in the vertical cross section (orange lines) show a broad area of cold pixels reaching from the area just discussed north-eastward over the surface front. Only some distance away from the surface front (north-eastward direction) cloud top temperatures decrease. The sharp decrease at about 52N/11E is connected with the Dark Stripe in the WV image already discussed.

For investigations of relative streams the same isentropic surfaces are chosen as for the Cold Front: 298K and 304K. The 298K surface is close to the top of the frontal zone, the 304K surface already above.

18 February 1996/06.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image; magenta: relative streams 298K - system velocity 305° 18m/s, yellow: isobars, red: front indicator, ECMWF grid superimposed, position of vertical cross section indicated
18 February 1996/06.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image; magenta: relative streams 305K - system velocity 305° 18m/s, yellow: isobars, red: front indicator, ECMWF grid superimposed, position of vertical cross section indicated
As mentioned also in the Cold Front discussion (compare Cold Front ) three main relative streams can be identified, but only the Warm Conveyor Belt originating in the Mediterranean and streaming across Spain and France north-eastward is involved in the process of the Warm Front. On both surfaces a rising branch of the Warm Conveyor Belt from the south-west crosses the Warm Front line in north-easterly directions: on the lower 298K surface the air mass rises from about 700 hPa in the warm sector to 750 hPa at the surface front and further up to 580 hPa; on the higher surface rising takes place from about 600 hPa within the warm sector and up to 550 hPa at the surface front. Behind the surface front the Warm Conveyor Belt turns southwards, accompanied by with a transition from rising to sinking and a dissolution of cloudiness. This can clearly be observed in the Warm Front cloud shield of this case study.

The Warm Front situation in this case study fulfils the conceptual model considerations very well.


SUB-MENU OF 18 - 19 FEBRUARY 1996
COLD FRONT
CLOUD FIBRE AT JET AXIS